Balipara and Sadiya Frontier Tracts in the Perspective of Colonial Geo Politics

Authors

  • Siddhartha Pait Assistant Professor, Department of History, Dibrugarh University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31305/rrjss.2025.v05.n02.018

Keywords:

Colonial, Geo politics, Russia, Frontiers, Tribes

Abstract

In few leading daily newspapers of North East India  very often Chinese attempt to increase its foothold around India through its ‘string of pearl strategy’ and Bangladesh caretaker government’s remarks on the North East make headlines drawing security concerns for India. Border dispute between India and China had been an outstanding issue over the past several decades which had gone to the extent of military mobilisation. Ever since the Buddhist pilgrims Kashyapa Matanga, Kumarajiva, and Dharmaraksa visited China, Sino-India relations had been historically peaceful for thousands of years. Most of the time in history it was occupied by exchange of cultural relations, trade and missions involving Tibetan Buddhism. After 1825 British India came into proximity with Tibet. During the Manchus regime no serious attempts were made to demarcate the boundaries form either side. Trade and cultural relations continued between Tibet and British India. The rise of Russian empire and subsequent exchange of diplomatic ties with Tibet drew curiosity of British India. The mountain crests and Himalayan watersheds were drawn into the geo-political board. Then came Mao’s rule which changed his stand on Tibet and emerged as revisionist power. This paper though, explores some of the historical developments within the ‘free flowing frontiers’ of the North East India, comprising mostly the Balipara and Sadiya frrontier tracts, will not delve into ongoing contemporary issues. It is an attempt to unveil some of there remote claims on so called ‘great game politics’ preceding the Communist era.

References

H.E. Richardson, Tibet and Its History, Oxford University Press: London, 1962, p. 186.

The term ‘frontier’ was defined by Alexander Mackenzie in the North-east Frontiers of Bengal to denote a demarcated boundary list or a tract. It embraced the northern, southern and eastern ranges of the hills of Assam valley, including the hill ranges between Bengal and Burma(Myanmar)

Journal of the Royal Asian Society, Vol. 26 Issue 2 1939 cited in http://www.claudeaspi:net/wp-content/upload/2020/08/The-Balipara-Fronteier-Tract-towards-Tawang.pdf.accessed on 06/10/2024.

Ibid.

Bertil Lintner, Great Game East, Harper Collins, 2016, p. 33-34.

Suisheng Zhao, A Nation State by Construction: Dynamics of Modern Chinese Nationalism, Stanford University Press, 2004, p. 68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503624498

Melvin C Goldstein, ‘Change, Conflict and Continuity among a Community of Nomadic Pastoralist: A Case Study From Western Tibet’, Resistance and Reform in Tibet, Robert Barnett and Shirin Akiner(Eds), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1994, p. 76-78.

J.J. Singh, The Mc Mahon Line: A Century of Discord, Harper Collins, 2019, p.20.

Ibid., p.147.

Robert Reid,History of the Frontier Areas Bordering on Assam 1883-1941Spectrum: Guwahati 1942, p. 283.

Singh op.cit., p. 80.

Morning Post, London, February 28, 1910.

Singhop.cit., p. 136.

Ibid., p. 137.

‘Forward Policy’ is a territorial policy of expansionist and annexation used by Britain and over external countries. British commercial interest in China subordinated Indian policy towards Tibet. Spence Heather in his British Policy and Development of Tibet 1912-1933mention that British India looked to emerge as Tibet’s protector and applied the ‘policy’ to provide technological, economic and military infrastructure to turn it into self supporting independent state, In Frontier Complex, Kyle J. Gardner refers to ‘forward policy’ as policy advocated by Rawlinson and Sandeman to control ‘farthest extend of controllable territory’ and favourable political condition beyond its claimed norder to create a ‘sphere of influence’ or ‘buffer zone’.

Source: Durham-e-Theses ‘Losing Face: The British foreign service and the question of Tibet 1904-1922’, Wendy Palace, www.http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5475

Dorothy Woodman,Himalayan Frontiers, Barrie and Rockliff, Creset Press: London1969, p.155.

Alistair Lamb, Sino-Indian Border in Ladakh, South Carolina Press, 1975, p.12 -13.

Ian Heath, The North East Frontier 1837-1901, OSPREY, 1999, p.3.

Alaister Lamb, The Mc Mahon Line, Vol.1 Routledge and Kegan PaulLtd: London,1966, p.35.

Singh, op.cit., p.23.

Manilal Bose, Historical and Constitutional Documents of North-Eastern India1824-1973, Concept: New Delhi. 1973, p.157.

June 29 1911, Operation Against Abor cited Indian High Commissionarticle ‘British Strategy and Mc Mahon Line : Arunachal A Means’ by P.K. Nayak, 2007 Vol 68 /http://www.jstor.org.stable/44147865/accessed on 14/10/2020)

Report on an Exploration on the North East Frontier 1913 F.M. Bailey ‘Chinese Action’ Government Monotype Press 1914 p. 22.

Ramachandra Guha, ‘Savaging the Civilised: Verrier Elwin, His tribals and India’ (Chicago Press) cited in Ambika Aiyadurai and Clarie SeunGeun Lee , AsianEthnicity, Vol. 76 No 2 (2017), p. 373.

Home Ministry of India noteNovember 7 1950 to The Prime Minister of India, cited in India’s China Perspective, Konark: New Delhi, 2001, p. 165-166.

M.L. Bose,British policy in the North East Frontier Agency, Concept Publication House: New Delhi, 1979 p. 115.

Lord Curzon lecture on Frontiers, Romanes Lecture, 1907, Published by Clarendon Press, 1907, p. 19-20.

Bose, op.cit., p.116.

Sajal Nag, The Mughals And the North-East, (Ed), Manohar, 2024, p.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003406020

Patrick French, Younghusband: The Last Great Imperial Adventurer, Flamingo: London, 1994, p. 186.

Jack Francil Needham was appointed as Assistant Political Officer in 1882, under the Deputy Commissioner of Lakhimpur. He served under Bengal Police and because of his enthusiasm and knowledge of the frontier tribes, he was assigned the task of dealing with the Abors. As a Political Officer, following orders from the Government of India in 1894, Needham accompanied a expeditionary force of 400 men to pacify the the Abors of Bomjir and Dambuk.

Thomas Laird, The Story of Tibet: Conversation with the Dalai Lama, Grove Press: New York, 2006, p.221.

S.K. Barpujari, ‘Paramountcy in the Hills, 1874-1914’, H.K. Barpujari (Edited), TheComprehensive History of Assam, Assam Publication Board, 1992, p.249.

Foreign Secret External, 1911, August, Letter nos 436-61, Letter to Secretary of State, cited at Barpujari op.citp. 48.

Peter Hopkirk, The Great Game- On Secret Service in High Asia, John Murray (Carmelite House) 2006, p. 519.

Suhindra Nath Bhattacharyya, A History of Mughal North-east Frontier Policy: A Study of Kamrup and Assam, Calcutta, 1994, p.322.

Mohan Guruswamy, ‘India -China Border Learning from History’, Economic andPolitical Weekly, Vol.38 No.39, September-October, 2003, p. 4102-4103.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Pait, S. (2025). Balipara and Sadiya Frontier Tracts in the Perspective of Colonial Geo Politics. Research Review Journal of Social Science , 5(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrjss.2025.v05.n02.018