Historical Perspective of Legal Education in Ancient India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrjss.2024.v04.n02.007Keywords:
Legal education, Vedic age, Legal doctrines, Philosophy, Traditions, Socio culturalAbstract
Education, often regarded as an invaluable and imperishable treasure, is a repository of humanity’s collective knowledge and wisdom. This idea is particularly evident in the history of jurisprudence, where present-day institutions are not products of sudden creation but rather the result of generations of accumulated experience and gradual evolution. Each generation inherits a legacy of ideas, traditions, and habits from its predecessors, which serve as the foundation for new developments. This continuity ensures that while the “old order” gives way to the “new,” it leaves a substantial nucleus of knowledge and practices, enriching and guiding future generations. In the realm of law, this process manifests as a compromise between the past and the present, where historical traditions blend with contemporary needs to shape legal doctrines. The dynamic evolution of legal systems demonstrates that laws are not static but are deeply rooted in the socio-cultural contexts of their time. Consequently, interpreting legal principles requires more than logical or abstract analysis; it necessitates a nuanced understanding of their historical and cultural origins. This interplay of continuity and change highlights the enduring relevance of education and history in shaping human institutions. It underscores the importance of contextual insight in interpreting and applying legal doctrines effectively. So far as legal education is concerned, it is perhaps the foremost requirement for the efficient working of any legal system and maintenance of legal order in the society. The legal education, if we see it from an Indian point of view, has its origins in the dissemination of the concept of dharma in ancient society. In the Vedic age, it was essentially the study and analysis of the rights and wrongs and the pursuit of the highest justice that pervaded organized learning into the Dharma philosophy.
References
Pandurang Vaman Kane, History of Dharamsastra (Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law), Volume III, 288 (Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Poona, 1946).
Dr. N.V. Paranjape, Legal Research with Dimensions of Legal Education in India 14 (Thomson Reuters, Legal, New Delhi, First edn., 2016).
Id. at 15.
Justice M. Rama Jois, Legal and Constitutional History of India 19 (Universal, Lexis Nexis, Greater Noida, Reprint, 2019).
Id. at 33.
Dr. Braja Kishore Swain, Naradsmrita (‘Tilottama’ Sanskrit Notes with Hindi Commentary Introduction, Technical word Index) (Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, Reprint edn., 2015).
Id. at 40.
Julius Jolly, The Minor Law Books, Part 1, Narada Brihaspati 29 (Oxford, The Clarendon Press, 1889).
Ludo Rocher, “Lawyers in Classical Hindu Law” Vol. 13 (3 & 4) Indian Bar Review 368 (1986).
Supra note 6 at 40-41.
Supra note 8.
Supra note 4 at 35.
Ibid.
Ibid.
K.V. Rangaswami Aiyanar, Brhaspatismriti 205 (Gaikwad’s Oriental Series, Baroda Oriental Institute, Baroda, 1941).
Supra note 8 at 288.
Supra note 9 at 360.
Supra note 4 at 35.
Sushma Gupta, History of Legal Education 48 (Deep and Deep Publications (P) Ltd., New Delhi, 2006).
P.V. Kane, Katyayanasmriti on Vyavahara (Law and Procedure) 14-15 (Raghunath Vasudev, Arya Sanskriti Press, Bombay, 1933).
Id. at 133.
Supra note 19.
Supra note 20 at 15.
Id. at 133.
Id. at 15.
Id. at 134.
Supra note 20 at 15.
Id. at 134.
Supra note 19 at 49.
Supra note 4 at 40.
Id. at 41.
Gustav Oppert (ed.), Sukranitisara 157 (E. Keys, at the Government Press, Madras, 1882).
Benoy Kumar Sakar, The Sacred Books of the Hindus, Sukranitisara 193 (Natha Vasu at Panini Office, Allahabad, 1913).
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33.
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33.
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33 at 194.
Supra note 1 at 290.
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33 at 194.
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33 at 194.
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33 at 194.
Supra note 32.
Supra note 33 at 194.
Supra note 32 at 158.
Supra note 33 at 194.
Dr. U.C. Sarkar, Epochs in Hindu Legal History 37 (Vishveshwaranand Vedic Research Institute, Hoshiarpur, First Edition, 1958).
Nathaniel Brassey Halhed, Code of Gentoo Laws, From a Persian Translation made from the original, written in the Sanskrit Language 234 (East India Company, London, 1776).
Ibid.
Ibid.
Supra note 4 at 37.
R.P. Kangle, The Kautilya Arthasastra Part I, A Critical Edition with a Glossary 145 (University of Bombay, Bombay, 1960).
R.P. Kangle, The Kautilya Arthasastra Part II, An English translation with critical and explanatory notes 318 (University of Bombay, Bombay, 1963).
Supra note 4 at 27.
Id. at 28.
Badri Nath Sharma, Shri Manusmriti 418 (The Choukhambha Sanskrit Service Office, Banaras, 2001).
G. Buhler, The Laws of Manu, An English Translation with extracts from Seven Commentaries 284 (Clarendon Press, London, 1986).
