The Bystander Effect: A Comparative Look at Online and Offline Worlds (From year 2020 to 2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31305/rrjss.2025.v05.n01.013Keywords:
Bystander effect, Online behaviour, Offline emergencies, Anonymity, Diffusion of responsibilityAbstract
The bystander effect is a well-known concept in social psychology. It describes how people are often less likely to step in and help during emergencies when others are present. Traditionally explored in face-to-face settings, this phenomenon has taken on new meaning with the rise of online interactions. This review takes a closer look at how core psychological processes behind the bystander effect play out differently in digital spaces. Elements like anonymity, the absence of social cues, and the massive potential audience online make a difference. The paper compares online and offline dynamics, explores key influencing factors such as fear of retaliation and platform design, and suggests context-based solutions. It calls for more interdisciplinary research to help address the modern complexities of this age-old social issue.
References
Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 566674.
Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites: An experimental study into bystanders' behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036
Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.290
Bernstein, J. P., Turban, D. B., & Miller, J. M. (2013). The online bystander effect: Evidence from a study on synchronous Facebook communications. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 2320-2326.
Brody, N., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2016). Perceptions of cyberbullying: An exploration of the role of communication cues and anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 67-73.
Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.100.3.283
Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., ... & Eastwick, P. W. (2011). The bystander effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023304
Li, Z., Zhao, F., & Peng, Z. (2023). The severity of cyberbullying affects bystander intervention among college students: The roles of feelings of responsibility and empathy. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1243–1256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S397770
Zanon, C., Dellazzana-Zanon, L. L., & Ribeiro, J. (2022). Prosocial personality traits and helping behavior: Examining the influence in bystander contexts. Personality and Individual Differences, 190, 111530.
